Search This Blog

Showing posts with label antithesis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label antithesis. Show all posts

06 July 2007

Kipling and Jeremiah, Today




Looking in on Palmer's Rudyard Kipling
The task of the Anglo-Indian administrator is, indeed, the finest opportunity for that heroic life to the celebration of which Mr Kipling has devoted so many of his tales. This hero has a task which taxes all his ability, which promises little riches and little fame, and is known to be tolerably hopeless. It offers to him a supreme test of his virtue--a test in which the hero is accountable only to his personal will; whose best work is its own reward and comfort.
"Gentlemen come from England," writes Mr Kipling in one of his famous Indian tales, "spend a few weeks in India, walk round this great sphinx of the Plains, and write books upon its ways and its work, denouncing or praising it as their ignorance prompts. Consequently all the world knows how the Supreme Government conducts itself. But no one, not even the Supreme Government, knows everything about the administration of the Empire. Year by year England sends fresh drafts for the fighting-line, which is officially called the Indian Civil Service. These die, or kill themselves by overwork, or are worried to death, or broken in health and hope, in order that the land may be protected from death and sickness, famine and war, and may eventually become capable of standing alone; but the idea is a pretty scary one, and men are willing to die for it, and yearly the work of pushing and coaxing and scolding and petting the country into good living goes forward. If an advance be made, all credit is given to the native, while the Englishmen stand back and wipe their foreheads. If a failure occurs, the Englishmen step forward and accept the blame. (Palmer 38, 39)

Although I hear the tinge of an anti-war yet effectually anti-peace mindset (which exists only in extremes of acceptance), I feel Kipling, and in effect Palmer as well, was in many ways prophetic, if not in actuality then at least in application. And while he recognized that the country of his focus could never stand alone, we must also understand that, of course, no country may stand alone. The foundation of success cannot be due to any man. In addition, the faults and failures of men and mice must be due to us all. We must adopt responsibility for all the flaws of mankind, yet still never live in guilt. We must take on the mentality of Jeremiah as seen in Lamentations 5:16-17,
"The crown has fallen from our head;
Woe to us, for we have sinned!
Because of this our heart is faint;
Because of these things our eyes are dim"

Although Jeremiah was one of God's chosen, he was accountable for the sins of his people. We must be always accountable yet remain living in constant grace. As in all things, there is a precious balance. It is grace in an antithetical reality. Black and white, no grey; yet forever grace for those who accept that gift. This is what it means to be balanced AND antithetical. No extremes, yet still a duality of light vs dark. It is not yin and yang. It is right vs wrong plus grace and mercy. Our people have sinned, and we diminish the efforts of our modern heroes. We have forgotten our history and are therefore condemned to failure. But there is hope yet. We have needs to be wise and discerning. Our choices in these upcoming days, and all days to come, must be balanced and antithetical. We must take on the charge. We must progress, not digress. Our eyes are still dim, but through the recognition of our calling and an understanding of our past, we can clean our worldview eyeglasses and correct our vision. Perhaps this is obvious. Perhaps this is unlikely. Perhaps this is difficult. But just maybe, this is truth. And truth is worth the struggle.

15 March 2007

A Valued Conversation.

I was looking back through some old work to see if I could incorporate anything from past assignments for one of my current classes. I came across an e-mail conversation I had with my honors teacher. The topic concerns relativism vs absolutism. I value this conversation not just for the praise my teacher offers (encouragment is important to him, even when occansionally it might be "forced"). The main reason I value this conversation is because I felt like I made a difference. Maybe it's not immediate change, I'm glad it's not immediate (no revolutions here, just reformations-- thank you very much). And most importantly, I stood up for my beliefs without harming my relationships with my teacher and the class. I stood up for my beliefs to the best of my meager abilities. I stood up for my beliefs and may have planted some seeds. It was interesting, as was the class. Below, I've changed the names (although it was totally unnecessary to do so) and my e-mails are in red while my teacher's are in blue. So here it is:


Jane (my project parnter) told me she sent you her exploratory essay...I just wanted to see if you had any advice for me as I get farther into the first draft. It's going to be harder for me to take this paper seriously because I don't really believe in it; but I guess creating a viable argument for something that I could easily argue against is part of rhetoric. Thanks for any help you may have to offer!!
Kala

I didn’t make time to look at it. I was actually waiting for revised drafts so that I could see what you were considering a more-or-less finished product. But it surprises me that you don’t see some value in what you are arguing. It seems to me you’ve had that experience this semester. I suspect prior to all of the discussion of absolutism and relativism, you would have—if simply given a definition—considered yourself only an absolutist. I may be wrong, but I got the sense that you would have recoiled from the idea of relativism at all. And yet, within a framework of absolutism, perhaps absolutism slightly redefined for yourself, you have come to see that you have bits of both. Weren’t you operating from an understanding that has grown and gained dimension, that has become more complete and more rich? Isn’t it possible that this understanding will grow still further, that your partial understanding now—which guides your life—will be transformed again and again? Isn’t this part of your argument, that partial truths don’t have to be monsters, that they can be foundations we consider positive, and they too are imperfect, that they too grow and change?
Joe


Thank you! I loved your words in the email you sent me. It all sounds beautiful! But...
In response: Yes, I do now have a more whole understanding of what it is that I actually believe; but I feel I am just as repulsed by and clear-minded about relativism as before. I still believe in antithesis and always will; but I also believe in balance and always have. I think the biggest change in my views is more on the side of understanding where they come from and how they ought to be presented--presented not with pragmatism or pacifism, rather with a hearty helping of reality (or as much of reality as I can get my hands on). I see value in my argument, but only as the means to further understanding the other side of the debate. If I can convincingly argue for something in which I do not believe, I think I will have a better handle on this thing called truth. I was initially wondering (perhaps worrying) that at some point of convincing, I'd start convincing myself. But the further I get into the research, the more I feel that my beliefs are in the right. You are likely to be right in saying that I would have previously considered myself an absolutist, yet only one in theory. Now I can only consider myself a truth-searcher, a truth-fighter, and--until someone convinces me otherwise-- a truth-obtainer. I agree that my understanding of things will forever be transforming; yet I doubt (I resist saying "I know" for the sake of being "open") that it will ever depart from my current foundation of beliefs. And in the end, for this presentation I will be arguing that almost truths don't have to be monsters. Yet I feel that almost truths are monsters, and just because they are accepted does not make them okay. In fact, if our world was in a position capable of facing truth and recognizing all monsters; well it just might be a good thing. Sure almost truths can be beneficial, but imagine if we had no need of them at all...that's what I wish we could all aspire toward. I do not believe it too idealistic a dream. Perhaps it is. But that just makes it all the more worth fighting for.
Thank you again for that email! I truly appreciate that you care and that you understand this is the stuff that matters most.
Kala

I have truly enjoyed our emails throughout the semester, and I am already missing these exchanges in advance for next semester. You are an incredibly thoughtful student, and you make it easy to enjoy teaching. Thanks for all the gifts you’ve given to the class and to me.
Joe